Posted by & filed under Consumerism, Economics, Global Warming/Climate Change, People Systems, Society, Village Development.

It offers an appealing alternative to more stuff and more money, which drives environmental destruction today.

It’s easy to not think about the looming climate crisis. For one thing, it’s depressing to ponder the misery ahead if we don’t take drastic steps now to curb greenhouse emissions. It’s even more depressing when you consider that even the most modest steps to reduce carbon use in the US have been derailed by corporate lobbyists and ideological zealots.

And even when we do think about climate change, it feels abstract and distant. How can a few parts per million of an invisible gas pose a dire threat to our future, no matter how convincing the scientific evidence. That’s why the heroic work of grassroots organizations like 350.org to translate these facts into action steps is so critical.

I recently read another fresh perspective on climate change that really hit home. “Probably the most pressing need is to shut down the engines of productivity,” said David Graeber — an organizer of Occupy Wall Street and author of Debt: The First 5000 Years who now teaches anthropology at the London School of Economics — in The Nation.

That’s an even more daunting mission than transforming our energy supply, especially on a planet where many people still suffer from a lack of material resources. Yet I think it’s the key to saving the Earth for human habitation. So long as the worship of productivity — more stuff, more money, more power, more mobility, more space, more control, more everything — reigns supreme, we will continue racing down the path of destruction.

It’s a radically radical proposition, not just in its challenge to business-as-usual in corporations and governments, but for the impact on every aspect of our lives. Still, to assure a world worth living in for everyone’s great grandchildren, it’s necessary to back off from the mindless pursuit of ever-increasing economic production. We must find a new operating system for modern society that will sustain natural ecosystems at the same time as providing everyone on the planet with food, health, livelihood and security.

An impossibly naive dream? Not really. For much of history, human progress was guided by a different set of principles than the industrialized, market-driven system now accepted as the natural order of the universe. Look around — at indigenous people and civil society, Internet initiatives and our own households — to see a different way of life characterized by sharing and collaboration rather than production for production’s sake.

We experience this way of life throughout our lives. Especially when we are enjoying time away from work and shopping — at the park, with our friends, playing with kids, participating in community activities. Pressed to produce a word to describe it, we might say common sense — which is pretty close to what some folks call it: the commons.

The commons means “what we share together”, distinct from what we own separately. It’s a form of wealth belonging to all of us, which is there for everyone to use so long as we take care to ensure there’s enough for future generations.

Greater appreciation of the commons will help ease the transition to a society less dedicated to production and economic growth. We cannot shift to a sustainable way of life without changing how we think about our place in the world. Slowing production will remain impossible so long as most people identify progress, success and self-worth by what is theirs alone.

The commons broadens people’s vision from what is mine to what is ours, allowing us to see that we are losing more in the quest for ever-more stuff and money than we are gaining. And while defenders of the status quo will roar that a commons way of life defies human nature, the truth is humans have lived this way for most of history. If human existence is to continue in the centuries ahead, it’s crucial that we rediscover this sense of what belongs to all of us together.

3 Responses to “How a Commons Way of Life Helps Curb Climate Change”

  1. Edward

    I have a cadre of Christian Military Zealots trying to confiscate my modest inheritance, for many years now without me even lnowing about this, in hopes of building a war chest to start WW3, in San Diego CA, believe it or not. He fancies himself like Ragnar in Atlas Shrugged(More like in Vikings). This seemingly has the support of at least part of the US Government. So, as the Military is basically a Socialist economic system, and I was(past tense) willing to do resiliance circles, now, I think that a hybrid arrangement would be preferrable, because for what needs to be changed and repaired, economy -of-scale will be required for some projects.

    Reply
  2. Br. Curt Beardsley

    Wendell Berry has some excellent essays on living with the commons model: “What Matters?, Economics for a Renewed Commonwealth” and “The Art of the Common Place”. I had never even really heard of the “Commons” before I read these. It might be difficult to accomplish, but I think it would be worth the effort.

    Reply
  3. Edward

    Good ref, thanks. It seems that were in the late stages of the Beer Vat scenario, and the cork is inching its way out, ready to pop, so to speak. Is sucess always expansive? Humans like success. What if we are in a cosmopolitan universe? Not surprising, but even then, at some point there will have to be a sustainability plateau, otherwise we are back in a ( larger) beer vat, witness our growing regional and national populations over the centuries. It’s the difference between accellerating your car to an appropriate speed, and jaming down the accellerator until you reach your destination, or, something stops you.
    We passed the fruit stand a few miles back.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)