CompostFungiSoil BiologySoil CompositionSoil ConservationSoil RehabilitationStructure

Organic? Biological? Natural Farming?

Part I


7 week Border King maize produced with grass humus

There are many articles now written about organic farming and there are many experts in the field. Noteworthy from these articles is that the land as such is never addressed.

It does not suit us to acknowledge that we, as agriculturists, know nothing of the biological ground. It is claimed that we currently have only discovered 2% of the soil biology, this while everyone moans about food security and future shortages.

Billions of US$ are spent annually on space research, astronomy and basic nuclear research, while the knowledge of agriculture is controlled by private sector companies who are basically profit based. Such awkward problems are not researched. This situation lends itself to “experts” who advise the farmer and also manage his finances. The farmer is thus conditioned to always have a professional Hi-tech solution expectation.

We are taught to live “hygienically” with stainless steel and glass, and with soap to manage the “germs”. We don’t realize that we are a part of nature and have origins in eating with our hands from the earth. The children do not play in the mud anymore or make paths in the ground where micro-organisms can be found and taken in. Our poor animals also walk around on this chemically treated, dead earth and so lack the needed micro-organisms in their systems. Most of our “pests” have a ground phase in their life cycle. Examples of this are ticks, stalkborers, codling moths, etc.. so they flourish in biologically dead soil because their natural predators are absent. Thus good results are obtained by giving cattle and wildlife, soil micro-organisms in their drinking water. More on this later.

Where is our land now in the picture? Some farmers are still burning the straw on the fields because there are no more micro-organisms left to break down the straw. Furthermore, the fire burns and kills the last of the above ground micro-organisms. Our lands are destroyed, chemically treated with fertilizer, chemicals, pesticides and so on. Our land is the most degraded biological entity on Earth, but we complain because we are losing the rhinoceros or wild dog.

Each mechanical cultivation kills off micro-organisms. The bigger our tractors, the more damage. Our tractors and implements have not, so far, developed to restore or build up the ground, only to destroy, because man is the "super predator" and only thinks of the maximum he can exploit in as short as time possible.

We must therefore, when we train the farmer, first teach him respect for the land and help him realize he works with a living biological entity. One cannot, however, see these soil microorganisms in the soil, hence we need to visualize what we are working with so we can care for it and use it correctly. It is like electricity, which you cannot see, but know how to use.

What is soil?

Physically we can divide soil into sand, silt, clay and humus. Sand and silt are mechanical, while clay and humus react chemically. The soil scientist knows a lot about clay because it can be chemically defined, quantified, etc.etc. Tremendous knowledge about this is available and we know how to cultivate plants with fertilizers, foliar spray, food solutions, etc. It is unfortunate that plants are chemically fed like this.

The biological part of the land was not considered important over the last 60 years or so. The humus component of soil is unfortunately much more complicated and there are very few experts in the field. We know that plants feed on this biological humus, but how the mold is formed and how the feeding takes place, we have not yet figured out. We can only go on practical trial results and professional, good observation and learn how to use it correctly. Until the time that the world will understand the importance of this aspect, there may still be many more doctorate degrees to be handed out.

Part II

Biologically Healthy Land

The humus fraction to which we have referred, it is often said, should be 2% of the land mass area. It is an unrealistic goal because 2% of topsoil a hectare weighs 80,000 kg. Thus if we want so much humus we must get 8,000kg of nitrogen from somewhere for the humus to take shape as the carbon to nitrogen ratio in humus is 10 or 12 to 1.

Or it is also pointed out that the organic material should be 2%. We find that our natural veld’s [a veld is South African open, unforested, or thinly-forested grass-country] organic material lies in the vicinity of 0.25%, what the roots of the grass include: and with this we get good production.

It must be remembered that parts of this humus form a complex combination of biochemical components, as well as a complex interplay of biological ingredients because, as the living part of the land (the part that we so easily destroy), a complex balance consists of live predators that feed on multiple levels, which make up the full spectrum of micro-organisms comprising of: bacteria, fungi, nematodes and others, to the size of earthworms.

Within this structure we find saprophytic microorganisms (organisms which break down organic matter) to microorganisms that enhance plant nutrition or are in symbiosis with plant root life or build up humus. Thus, the addition of organic matter to the dead land usually makes no difference to this soil fertility. And we see that the administration of compost makes a very small contribution to the building up of humus. Only 20% of the annually administered compost is, after five years of analysis, again detected. The overall effect on soil structure is minimal because the compost chemically appears as fertilizer. The micro-organisms which appear in the compost do not represent the soil microorganism spectrum.

Farming in the Tropics

An example is when South African farmers in the tropics began clearing to plant maize. The land is beautiful, the rainfall is stable, and the returns are high.

After six years, however, the gray leaf spot, Diplodia and the termites became very difficult. On closer inspection, it appeared that the loss of organic material resulted in a severe building up of the stubby root nematode, so much so, that they could not produce anything anymore.

Now we can understand why continual clearing takes place and new lands are made in Brazil, Zambia, etc. and the forests destroyed, resulting in climate change and the “slash and burn” and move system of the local population every two years. Furthermore, the total area is burned by the residents during July, August and September in order to hunt.

What is the solution? We need to return or restore the biological fraction of the land. It has been proven that the moment when this balance is right, the termites are no more of a problem and the returns are high.

Creating and Using Compost

Compost should play a more important role in agriculture. There are many sources of organic matter that are not correctly utilized. Compost making is the making of "fertilizer" from organic matter. There are many recipes that different people use. However, it all just boils down to the breaking down of plant material by saprophytic micro-organisms.

Just as a carcass is cleaned up by the jackals and vultures so that only the bones remain, in much the same way, a piece of organic material is broken down so that only the chemical building blocks remain. If compost is thus chemically analyzed (like soil) to see what is therein, it can be utilized as fertilizer. The value of the organic fraction of compost is overstated. The reason for this is that the saprophytic microorganisms that effectively make compost are not the same as those that build ground humus. We cannot therefore fully biologically recover the ground with compost. The effect of compost on soil structure is minimal.

There is a physical effect on the water holding capability from the organic material as well as the soil being looser. When a mixture of crop residues is used and there is enough green material present, the compost usually gets going because enough micro-organisms are present. If more dry material is used, to get the process underway, the addition of micro-organisms is necessary.


Forefront of image: grass humus filled with roots.
Deep dark strip humus not formed, probably anaerobic


Excess compost poorly mixed with the soil

In Amsterdam in Holland the gathering of all garden waste, street leaves etc. takes place to create thousands of tons of compost which is then sold to plant nurseries and to the farmers. They use huge machines to flip it and make huge piles where they put lactic acid bacteria to get the process in motion (same as for silage). The availability of compost is essential for the supply of lower-order plants.


Large compost inverting machine near Amsterdam in Holland

Grazing experts divide plants into two categories, namely, pioneer plants and climax vegetation. The function of pioneer plants in nature is to cover bare patches and to restore ground cover in order for climax plants to take over. The number of pioneer plants is surprisingly a great deal; from klits grass, stick grass, couch grass, khaki bush to cabbage, radishes, beets, beans. If these plants are to be grown, compost will be needed, as these plants feed chemically.

What is very interesting here for the farmer is that climax plants can feed on humus and thus do not compete with pioneer plants, ie. if humus is available in biologically healthy soil, then pioneer plants disappear. The more chemically fertile a farmer’s lands, the more problems he has with this weed, while the more biologically fertile a farmer’s land becomes and humus appears, the smaller the problem of weeds becomes.

The Use of Compost Tea

The making of compost tea entails the activation of the saprophytic bacteria found in the compost. This is then used for the biological control of eg. fungal disease on the leaves of sunflowers. It has its own specific use (almost like one would use headache pills to lessen the pain) but it will not address the core problem of soil fertility. This also applies to many biological products on the market. The use of micro-organisms for biological control is a highly technical field that requires specific knowledge. Farmers who want to trade in it will have to form groups and establish a laboratory; otherwise it will cost farmers a lot of money.

Part III

Improvement of Soil Biology

Because this complex spectrum exists, it does not help to have a limited number of organisms. eg. Suppose someone starts a game ranch; he is not going to be able to maintain an ecological balance if he does not have a variety of grazers, bush eaters and predators (to ensure balance the practice of burning yearly on the ranch, should not take place). Also for example if the jackals and genets are killed to protect the small buck, the rats start to take over.

A whole soil micro-organism complex must therefore be acquired. It can be obtained from a place where healthy soil occurs (where, for at least 15 years the soil has never been disturbed or burned); the upper 10cm of the soil and organic matter is removed and is mixed with more organic matter and is then applied to depleted soil. We can thus obtain these micro-organisms and use them as the ‘seed’, or inoculant, to repopulate the soil. These micro-organisms and organic matter must be mixed into the top 200mm of soil. (Organic matter can be anything such as crop residues, manure, bedding from broiler chickens, but not compost).

A simple solution to acquiring a complete soil micro-organism mix in liquid form at a very reasonable price is to source it from a Bio bank and to then blend the liquid directly together with organic material into the topsoil.

Deep Nutrition of Plants

Dr. Cloete, after much research with orchards of apples, citrus, mangoes, peaches and bananas discovered that trees and plants feed far deeper than the 400mm aerobic portion of the ground.

This discovery, which deserves the Nobel Prize in Agriculture, is that the most important nutritional contribution to plants, located deeper than 500mm, is from organisms which do not thrive in oxygen. (There is no literature nor are there experts who have knowledge of such an anaerobic life which exists underground and which is able to feed plants).


The black spots in the upper soil layers are compost and deeper down (the level
showing the deep black spot with roots) contains a layer of chicken manure
and anaerobic bacteria at 70cm.

These deep microbes in question are available through the bio-bank of Andre van Rensburg (and can be buried with organic material directly deep into the ground, at a depth of 500mm – 800mm under the planting row, over which planting can immediately occur).

For the last six years I have worked on maize and have based my conclusions on good observations, but academically, it is not yet confirmed. I’ll be very glad if someone could correct me as to where I’m wrong. So far I still cannot get the LNR and other agencies to do any research on this aspect.

It is clear to me that the deep nutrition aspect from maize can contribute more than 50% of the yield. A yield of 25 tonnes per hectare under irrigation is easy with the availability of modern hybrids. It must, however, in both cases occur with the help of compost and chicken manure together with the bio-organisms because modern hybrid maize cannot grow with humus.

The old open pollinated hybrids grow very well in humus and deep nutrition but do not have a high yielding potential. In light of above facts, it is clear that no machinery exists to run such a commercial farm industry. On small and test site based plots, unbelievable results are being obtained with both methods, shallow and deep.

Perceived Effects of Healthy Soil

  1. High yields are obtained; 25 tons of maize and more per hectare on irrigation.
  2. If a plant is completely fed, plant diseases are minimal or disappear altogether: eg. Gray leaf spot and termites.
  3. Some highly cultivated varieties cannot grow without chemical feeding and have lost the ability to feed on humus. Seed should therefore first be tested.
  4. Lower-order plants will not grow well when humus is around; feeding probably chemically, eg. Cabbage, turnips, beets, ephorbias, brassicas, herbs, eg. khaki weed, wandering jew.
  5. Weed pressure virtually disappears, ie. the more weeds on the land the more soil biology destruction is occuring.
  6. When humus can be produced from dry field grass or maize stalks in two months without application of micro-organisms then the soil biology has fully recovered.
  7. Andre van Rensburg’s aerobic commercial mixture’s main objective is to produce humus and give the most humus with dry field grass that contains a lot of cellulose and lignin.

Further Reading:

~~~~~~

Biobank

The bio-bank, compiled by Dr. Pieter Cloete, is now run by Andrè van Rensburg. These micro-organism mixtures are alive and should not be left out in the sun nor should they be administered with high pressure pumps.

Interviews with farmers of the soil aerobic micro-organisms’ effect on cattle and wildlife, after applying treatment through drinking water, reported amazing results.

Contact Andrè van Rensburg for more information.
Andrè is the bio-bank manager of Grow-Agra, situated, near Naboomspruit, South Africa. Call him on: (082) 431-5065

Additional contact details
Janie Snyman
gentracsnyman (at) mtnloaded.co.za
Cell: (076) 600-6196

4 Comments

  1. So basically you dig a ditch 70cm below the surface, dump manure/compost/organic material in it, cover it with soil, and plant the corn above as usual?
    Is that the meaning of the whole article?
    Is this a new use for the old “runner bean trench”?

  2. This is a fantastic article, thanks for writing it! Soil microbiology is one of the most neglected aspects in agriculture today and one of the most necessary for true health and fertility of both the crops and the people that consume them. Some people are aware of the amazing increase in yields that can come from promoting soil microbiology, but as you said in your article we know only 2% of the organisms that exist in the soil. This is an amazing field for shared research in the permaculture community, especially interesting to me is the difference in the types of microorganisms that exist in different ecosystems i.e. annuals versus perennials and agriculture versus forestry. In each of these niches the soil microbiology is different and has a different role to play.

    I am currently experimenting with a new biodynamic earthworm product a friend of mine produces which is showing amazing results both in pest and pathogen management and fertility he is almost done trademarking it and I will post the information when it’s available for anyone is interested. I would love to hear more input on this subject from folks. Thanks again for your article.

  3. Interesting article. It’s a good point you raised about how compost organisms do not represent the entire spectrum of soil microbes. Some of my practices arise from laziness, but now this point has given me better reason to be so.

    Here’s a confession. I don’t actually like adding pre-made compost to soils. I prefer to (hot*) compost organic material directly on the area intended for a crop. The worms, insects, microbes, fungi and even leaching from rain water do a much better job at mixing the compost into the soil than any garden fork. It saves a lot of energy, effort and time. It’s how nature intended it. Compost teas have their benefits, but it seems rather superfluous in the face of nature’s elegant designs.

    *Hot composting ensures most weed seeds are killed by the heat (reduces the need to weed later on). Avoid using direct composting near tree roots which can burn. The heat and microbes are a great way to cleanse the ground before planting.

  4. Hello Joseph

    We are very thankful and encouraged by your comments and appreciation of the article on soil microbiology which our friend, Niki Neave, submitted on our behalf and that Craig Macintosh was willing to publish it on the blog of the Permaculture Research Institute.

    I appreciated that you supplied your e-mail address. Since I found your business logo very attractive, I have printed it out to include into my BIO-ORGANIC FILE.

    We would like to know more about where in the world your office are situated, and about your qualifications, since you seem to be a Micro-biologist yourself and able to send people in the right directions as your logo also reveal. You said that it is an amazing field for shared research in the permaculture community and revealed that there should be different reactions on micro-organisms between annuals versus perennials and agriculture versus forestry. How right you are. Well, in our (small) trials we experienced these facts and found that in fertile soil pioneer growth (weeds etc.) do not grow so prominently when the GROW AGRA is used.. There is still a vast field for research left wide open.

    What we really would like is the marriage of Soil Microbiology and Permaculture, which go hand in hand.

    We would also like to hear more about the earthworm product.

    Nico & Janie Snyman
    Rustenburg
    South Africa
    Email: [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button